[PATCH v2] kernel-doc: drop various "inline" qualifiers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Oct 2006 15:00:18 +0200 Rolf Eike Beer wrote:

> The inline status of a function is not of much help for a developer, that's 
> right. But I would like to see the the __must_check in the documentation. 
> This it what makes a difference, the inline stuff is extraneous.

---
From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Drop __inline, __always_inline, and noinline in the
produced kernel-doc output, similar to other pseudo directives.

Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
---
 scripts/kernel-doc |    3 +++
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- linux-2619-rc1g3.orig/scripts/kernel-doc
+++ linux-2619-rc1g3/scripts/kernel-doc
@@ -1518,6 +1518,9 @@ sub dump_function($$) {
     $prototype =~ s/^asmlinkage +//;
     $prototype =~ s/^inline +//;
     $prototype =~ s/^__inline__ +//;
+    $prototype =~ s/^__inline +//;
+    $prototype =~ s/^__always_inline +//;
+    $prototype =~ s/^noinline +//;
     $prototype =~ s/__devinit +//;
     $prototype =~ s/^#define +//; #ak added
     $prototype =~ s/__attribute__ \(\([a-z,]*\)\)//;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux