Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device

> It's against libata development tree.  So, you downloaded the tar.gz and
> tested it?

no, but at latest kernel 2.6.19-rc1 use the same tree as you said, and
it also can worked

And, one more thing to try.  The following patch should fix your
problem.  It's against v2.6.18.

while applied the patch, error info gone :)

A question: if the status register return 0xFF means the device not exist?
why not use ata_devchk()?

thanks

-Joe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: "Joe Jin" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
    • From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Status on CPU hotplug issues
• Next by Date: Re: [patch 1/2] sysfs: allow removal of nonexistent sysfs groups.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] libata: skip reset on bus not a device
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]