On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 17:07 +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>
> so do it. The ones that are in development are easily fixed and
> consistency is worth a LOT in terms of API. Bonus points if the kernel
> printk's a helpful message on abuse.
>
I was kicking myself for the "clocksource" kernel parameter removal, but
I guess that's more akin to being exposed to userspace.
The printks might just end up being an OOPS, but I can look into it.
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]