Am Sonntag, 8. Oktober 2006 02:03 schrieb David Brownell:
> > The power management functions without
> > timeout are also exported. For other power control features like
> > cpu frequency considerable effort has been made to export them to
> > user space.
>
> Yes, and many of us use the much lighter weight kernel based control
> models by preference. Why waste hundreds of Kbytes of userspace for
> a daemon when a few hundred bytes of kernel code can implement a
> better and more reactive kernel policy for cpufreq?
That's an important aspect. How about implementing autosuspend
first and keeping the sysfs-based suspension for now? If autosuspend
is done, we have something to compare too. If a different solution
emerges to be advantagous under some conditions we can talk about
the interface later.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
