Daniel Walker <[email protected]> writes:
> On Sun, 2006-10-08 at 03:41 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
>
>> >>>
>> >>> We'll need to change it.
>> >>
>> >> We can add a call to clocksource_rating_change() inside
>> >> acpi_pm_need_workaround(), are there deeper dependencies?
>> >
>> > There is no deeper dependencies. If it's meaning
>> > clocksource_reselect() in current git, it sounds good to me.
>>
>> Ah, I was forgetting why I didn't before. If it's a buggy pmtmr, we'll
>> get corrupted time until re-selecting the clocksource.
>>
>> If anybody doesn't care this will be good with it. If not, we would
>> need to back to old one. IIRC, John did it.
>
> We could just reverse it, use the verified read function until we know
> it's a good PM timer, then switch to the faster read function.
Yes, we did it in old timer code.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
