Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes

Al Viro wrote:

diff --git a/include/asm-alpha/irq_regs.h b/include/asm-alpha/irq_regs.h
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..3dd9c0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/asm-alpha/irq_regs.h
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+#include <asm-generic/irq_regs.h>

ACK, of course, but I wonder if we can do something about these 1-line header files.

Would it be reasonable to encourage developers to do something like

	#ifdef ARCH_HAVE_FEATURE_FOO
	#include <asm/foo.h>
	#else
	#include <asm-generic/foo.h>
	#endif

to avoid these 1-line headers?

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
    • From: Sam Ravnborg <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
    • From: Al Viro <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
• Previous by thread: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] minimal alpha pt_regs fixes
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]