Re: Really good idea to allow mmap(0, FIXED)?

Hi!
> 
> > > Besides that, I currently don't see a valid reason to mmap address 0.
> > > 
> > > Comments?
> > 
> > User zero is not neccessarily mapped at kernel zero so your argument
> > isn't portable either.
> 
> Eh, so what about the following.
> We _have_ arches which map user zero to kernel zero. What about
> specialcasing that on a per-arch case. So remapping user zero to
> something else in kernel.

Just add some magic constant on architectures you care about... make
user 0 start at 4mb in kernel... and you get your security hardened
kernel w/o breaking dosemu. All you need is to create a patch :-)


-- 
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Really good idea to allow mmap(0, FIXED)?
    • From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>
  • Re: Really good idea to allow mmap(0, FIXED)?
    • From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
  • Re: Really good idea to allow mmap(0, FIXED)?
    • From: Michael Buesch <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] honour MNT_NOEXEC for access()
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Distinguish between errors and warnings in modpost
• Previous by thread: Re: Really good idea to allow mmap(0, FIXED)?
• Next by thread: Re: Really good idea to allow mmap(0, FIXED)?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]