On Fri, 6 Oct 2006 22:52:11 -0400 Matt LaPlante wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> Thanks for the feedback as always. See below...
>
> > > -iii.Ability to represent large i/os w/o unecessarily breaking them up (i.e
> > > +iii.Ability to represent large i/os w/o unnecessarily breaking them up (i.e
> >
> > I'd prefer to see "I/Os" "without" "i.e.".
>
> This style is throughout this text. It can be changed, but would be easier to do in
> its own diff rather than changing the whole file here. Left as-is.
Yes, agreed.
> > > - triggers an interrupt on the SPU. The value writting to the signal
> > > + triggers an interrupt on the SPU. The value writing to the signal
> >
> > I think that should be "written".
> >
> > > -may result unpredictabe behavior.
> > > +may result unpredictable behavior.
> >
> > may result in unpredictable behavior.
> >
>
> Fixed and Fixed. Updated version below.
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
