Re: Using "Asynchronous Notifications" within an interrupt handler

["Madhu Saravana Sibi Govindan" <ssshayagriva@gmail.com>]

Thanks for the information.

I have another quick question: my device driver can expect up to 4
different interrupts (from 4 hardware devices). Can I send a posix
real-time signal (SIGRTMIN) using the kill_async interface and expect
the kernel to queue these signals for delievery to the sleeping
process? (Because if I use SIGIO it is possible that an incoming
interrupt is lost because the kernel doesn't queue up normal signals,
right?).

Thanks,
G.Sibi

On 10/6/06, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> >
> > My question is: is it safe to use the asynchronous notification
> > mechanism within an interrupt handler? I see that this call acquires a
> > bunch of locks before sending the signal to the process. Would this
> > cause any deadlocking situations? Or should I resort to the top and
> > bottom half approach for interrupt handling and handle the
> > notification in the bottom half?
>
> It may be possible - I have an old driver for custom hardware lying
> around here, and it does this in the irq handler:
>
> kill_fasync(&global.fasync_ptr, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
>
>
>
>         -`J'
> --
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/