Re: [discuss] Re: Please pull x86-64 bug fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ar Iau, 2006-10-05 am 23:44 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> I think we had that argument before. IMHO such messages are completely
> useless. Hangs are not acceptable no matter what messages are printed
> before.

Oh so you plan to fix the iommu/aacraid problem you always said you
wouldn't fix ?
 
> > That gets us the best of both worlds.
> 
> Hanging systems? 

Working systems because the only hang case will be if you use hardware
that requires the new goodies on a box that is *actually* broken rather
than one which is misdetected by the paranoid check code. 

Alan

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux