Ar Iau, 2006-10-05 am 23:44 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> I think we had that argument before. IMHO such messages are completely
> useless. Hangs are not acceptable no matter what messages are printed
> before.
Oh so you plan to fix the iommu/aacraid problem you always said you
wouldn't fix ?
> > That gets us the best of both worlds.
>
> Hanging systems?
Working systems because the only hang case will be if you use hardware
that requires the new goodies on a box that is *actually* broken rather
than one which is misdetected by the paranoid check code.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
