[S390] incorrect placement of include.

From: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>

[S390] incorrect placement of include.

The include of linux/smp.h needs to be done before the #if that
checks for the compiler version. Seems like fallout from the
inline assembly cleanup patch vs. the directed yield patch.

Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
---

 include/asm-s390/spinlock.h |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -urpN linux-2.6/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h linux-2.6-patched/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h
--- linux-2.6/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h	2006-10-04 19:53:37.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6-patched/include/asm-s390/spinlock.h	2006-10-04 19:53:49.000000000 +0200
@@ -11,10 +11,10 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
 #define __ASM_SPINLOCK_H
 
-#if __GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 2)
-
 #include <linux/smp.h>
 
+#if __GNUC__ > 3 || (__GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ > 2)
+
 static inline int
 _raw_compare_and_swap(volatile unsigned int *lock,
 		      unsigned int old, unsigned int new)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: [S390] Add timeouts during sense PGID, path verification and disband PGID.
• Next by Date: [S390] Have s390 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes.
• Previous by thread: [S390] Add timeouts during sense PGID, path verification and disband PGID.
• Next by thread: [S390] Have s390 use add_active_range() and free_area_init_nodes.
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]