Re: [PATCH] Fix WARN_ON / WARN_ON_ONCE regression

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 21:39 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:

> 
> I don't think you've proved your case here.  Do you *know* there are 
> extra cache misses (ie, measuring them), or is it just your theory to 
> explain a performance regression?
> 

I have measured the cache miss with tool.  So it is not just my theory.

Tim
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux