* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote: > > hm, do you have the NMI watchdog enabled by any chance? [in > > particular, do you have nmi_watchdog=2?] Although your bootlog does > > not show it. > > > > There's no nmi_watchdog setting in the kernel boot command line and > the NMI counter isn't incrementing. there's one material difference we just found: in the !hres case we'll do the timer IRQ handling mostly from the lapic vector - while in mainline we do it from the irq0 vector. So, how does your /proc/interrupts look like? How frequently does LOC increase, and how frequently does IRQ 0 increase? (meanwhile we'll fix and restore things so that it matches mainline behavior.) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- References:
- [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/12] i386: Force section size to be non-zero to prevent a symbol becoming absolute
- Next by Date: [PATCH] raid class: handle component-add errors
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] clockevents: drivers for i386, fix #2
- Index(es):
 |