> >> > [ 138.751306] [<ffffffff8021ecc0>] search_extable+0x40/0x70
> >
> >After here the unwinder seems to become a bit and it shouldn't print
> >multiple entries. Jan any ideas why?
>
> Not without raw stack contents.
I suppose those are lost in time.
Unfortunately lockdep doesn't even print stack contents because it doesn't
save them.
> >Proposed patch appended. Jan, what do you think?
>
> As said above - I thought we added zero-termination already.
For head.S but not for kernel_thread I think. At least I can't
find any existing code for kernel_thread().
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]