Re: 2.6.18-mm2 - oops in cache_alloc_refill()

[Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>]

On  3/10, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:

| > I suggest that you revert the memset() to IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE+1 so that
| > the last byte is cleared as well. Or am I missing something?
| 
| No, that would bring back the slab/memory overflow we are
| trying to get rid of.

Then I am puzzled by the function declaration:

static int orinoco_hw_get_essid(struct orinoco_private *priv, int *active,
                                char buf[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE+1])

Do you mean that this function is called with a buf parameter which
doesn't have the expected size? (as far as the function declaration is
concerned) Shouldn't the declaration be changed to

static int orinoco_hw_get_essid(struct orinoco_private *priv, int *active,
                                char buf[IW_ESSID_MAX_SIZE])

then to reflect the reality? (it won't change the code but would be
clearer from a documentation point of view)

 Sam

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/