Ar Maw, 2006-10-03 am 12:11 +0200, ysgrifennodd Andi Kleen:
> On Tuesday 03 October 2006 05:24, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> Actually I looked at the code more closely. It looks like kernel math
> emulation is much more broken. e.g. kernel_fpu_begin() is missing
> code and lots of other paths in i387 that need to check HAVE_HWFP don't.
That check would be wrong anyway. A kernel built with FPU emulation
boots, runs and uses the hardware FPU code correctly. The problem area
is the X86_FEATURE_foo stuff. I think that comes down to a single thing
- if we have FPU disabled clear X86_FEATURE_FXSR|X86_FEATURE_MMX|
X86_FEATURE_SSE* in the boot cpu features during early option
parsing/setup. Basically the emulated FPU is forgetting to tell the
truth about the fact its a very basic FPU.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
