Re: [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19

"Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]> writes:

> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
>> Have you tested your driver against the -mm tree?
>
> No.
>
>> To the best of my knowledge the irq handling of your hypertransport card
>> is a complete and total hack that works only by chance.
>
> And a happy Monday morning to you, too :-)
:)

>> In the -mm tree I have added a first pass at proper support for the
>> hypertranport interrupt capability.  As this code is slated to go into
>> 2.6.19 could you please test against that?
>
> I'm on vacation for a few weeks.  We'll find someone to do it.

Sure.  I talked to Dave Olson about this a while ago, and I couldn't
get anything happening.

Eric


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19
    • From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [2.6 patch] mark virt_to_bus/bus_to_virt as __deprecated on i386
• Next by Date: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 008 of 11] knfsd: Prepare knfsd for support of rsize/wsize of up to 1MB, over TCP.
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0 of 28] ipath patches for 2.6.19
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]