Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers

From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 13:54:33 -0700 (PDT)

> So if the patch works against my current tree, and nobody objects, I can 
> certainly apply it.
> 
> So speak up, people...

Since it provides a suitable nestability of the regs setting, I have
no objections.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
  - From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
  - From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch 2.6.18-git] SPI -- Freescale iMX SPI controller driver
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 3/3] IRQ: Maintain regs pointer globally rather than passing to IRQ handlers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]