On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 08:11:34PM +0000, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> @@ -6838,9 +6838,9 @@ restart_timer:
>
> static int tg3_request_irq(struct tg3 *tp)
> {
> + struct net_device *dev = tp->dev;
> irqreturn_t (*fn)(int, void *, struct pt_regs *);
> unsigned long flags;
> - struct net_device *dev = tp->dev;
>
> if (tp->tg3_flags2 & TG3_FLG2_USING_MSI) {
> fn = tg3_msi;
Is there any reason for this noise?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC PATCH] move tg3 to pci_request_irq
- From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
- Re: [RFC PATCH] move tg3 to pci_request_irq
- References:
- Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
- From: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
- From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH] pci_request_irq (was [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity)
- From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
- [RFC PATCH] move tg3 to pci_request_irq
- From: Frederik Deweerdt <[email protected]>
- Re: [-mm patch] aic7xxx: check irq validity (was Re: 2.6.18-mm2)
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH] move aic7xxx to pci_request_irq
- Next by Date: Re: Spam, bogofilter, etc
- Previous by thread: [RFC PATCH] move tg3 to pci_request_irq
- Next by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH] move tg3 to pci_request_irq
- Index(es):
 |