Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module

On 10/1/06, Randy Dunlap <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually I had this mentally tagged as "needs more arguing before merging"
> but then forgot and went and sent it anyway.

Well, we agree on that part at least.

> So now it's in the "needs more arguing before we revert it" category.

Wrong order IMO.

I think we should pull it and then argue about putting it back in.

   Ross
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
  • Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
    • From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Introduce BROKEN_ON_64BIT facility
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] usb hubc build fix.patch prefix
• Previous by thread: Re: [patch 024/144] allow /proc/config.gz to be built as a module
• Next by thread: [SCSI] IPS bug found
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]