Sorry, I had typed wrong word.
It is because patent issue.
Thnaks.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Roland Dreier" <[email protected]>
To: "Andrew Morton" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Jesse Huang" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] remove TxStartThresh and RxEarlyThresh
> > For pattern issue need to remove TxStartThresh and RxEarlyThresh.
> Please describe this issue more completely.
>
> What are the implications of simply removing this feature? Presumably
that
> code was there for a reason..
Actually I think this patch needs to be handled delicately -- because
based on earlier emails from Jesse
(http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg22254.html),
I am pretty sure that "pattern" is a typo for "patent". So I guess
the question is what exactly the patent covers and what the
implications of having the current kernel code are.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
