Re: + allow-proc-configgz-to-be-built-as-a-module.patch added to -mm tree

On Sun, Oct 01, Randy Dunlap wrote:

> Can any of the distro people chime in here?  Andrew merged this
> patch to mainline today.  Several people had disagreed with merging
> it, but now Andrew says we need more discussion (if or) in order to
> revert it.

Everyone who wants this to be =m can do so.
The rest will likely leave it =y.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- Re: + allow-proc-configgz-to-be-built-as-a-module.patch added to -mm tree
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
Next by Date: [PATCH 1/5] remove TxStartThresh and RxEarlyThresh
Previous by thread: Re: + allow-proc-configgz-to-be-built-as-a-module.patch added to -mm tree
Next by thread: Re: + allow-proc-configgz-to-be-built-as-a-module.patch added to -mm tree
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]