On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:59:01 -0000, Thomas Gleixner said: > the following patch series is an update in response to your review. This complains if you try to compile with -Werror-implicit-function-declaration and rightly so, as we're missing a #include to define IS_ERR_VALUE(). Patch attached. Signed-off-by: Valdis Kletnieks <valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu> --- linux-2.6.18-mm2/kernel/hrtimer.c.buggy 2006-10-02 00:46:50.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.18-mm2/kernel/hrtimer.c 2006-10-02 01:02:55.000000000 -0400 @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ #include <linux/clockchips.h> #include <linux/profile.h> #include <linux/seq_file.h> +#include <linux/err.h> #include <asm/uaccess.h> --- linux-2.6.18-mm2/kernel/time/clockevents.c.buggy 2006-10-02 00:46:50.000000000 -0400 +++ linux-2.6.18-mm2/kernel/time/clockevents.c 2006-10-02 01:04:22.000000000 -0400 @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #include <linux/profile.h> #include <linux/sysdev.h> #include <linux/hrtimer.h> +#include <linux/err.h> #define MAX_CLOCK_EVENTS 4 #define GLOBAL_CLOCK_EVENT MAX_CLOCK_EVENTS
Attachment:
pgp6oe52lVhMs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
- [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- Prev by Date: [PATCH] schedule ftape removal
- Next by Date: Re: Smaller compressed kernel source tarballs?
- Previous by thread: [patch 02/21] GTOD: persistent clock support, core
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 00/21] high resolution timers / dynamic ticks - V2
- Index(es):
 |