On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:20 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:13:54PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 20:07 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > > On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 12:03:10PM -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > > > And that's better than the current situation in which respects, exactly?
> > > >
> > > > Seeing the warnings is the current situation.
> > >
> > > I bow to your incredible power of observation. Now that you've shared
> > > that revelation with the list, could you explain what does blanket silencing
> > > of these warnings buy you, oh wan^H^Hise one?
> >
> > Did you see me silencing anything (with your crystal ball?) ? Cause I'm
> > not.
>
> And what, in your opinion, does the patch in question achieve if not
> that?
You mean the patch from Steven posted in May? Well it does appear to
silence the warning. You didn't like the approach it seems? Please tell
me why .
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
