Re: [linux-pm] [RFC] OMAP1 PM Core, PM Core Implementation 2/2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > > Some nitpicking about the patch follows..
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Sep 30, 2006 at 02:24:35AM +0400, Eugeny S. Mints wrote:
> > > > +static long 
> > > > +get_vtg(const char *vdomain)
> > > > +{
> > > > +	long ret = 0;
> > > 
> > > Unnecessary initialisation.
> > 
> > No, sorry.
> 
> In get_vtg(), if VOLTAGE_FRAMEWORK is defined then
> 
> 	ret = vtg_get_voltage(v);
> 
> is the first user. If VOLTAGE_FRAMEWORK is not defined, the first user is:
> 
> 	ret = vtg_get_voltage(&vhandle);
> 
> Then "return ret;" follows. I cannot see a path where 
> pre-initialisation of ret does anything useful. If someone removed the
> #else part, the compiler would bark.

Ahha, sorry, I did not look at this kind of context.
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux