Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 3/8] UML - Fix missing x86_64 register definitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:49:07PM +0200, Blaisorblade wrote:
> The patch is ok for me, but frankly, this hunk could be further cleaned up - 
> there is an awful hardcoded duplication of code which could be removed (the 
> definition could be split away from <sysdep/ptrace.h> if inclusion order hell
> starts).

Yeah, these headers needs some serious cleanup.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux