x86 BUG bug

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have a couple ATA drivers that spit out "foo might be used uninitialized" warnings. Rather than the usual gcc nonsense, it turns out that the code follows this pattern:

	type_t foo;

	if (condition 1)
		foo = x;
	else if (condition 2)
		foo = y;
	else
		BUG();

It doesn't warn on other platforms, so I dug into the BUG() code on x86, and discovered that it is missing the 'noreturn' attribute found in other BUG() definitions.

Being rusty on the gcc asm syntax -- does an inline asm statement permit 'noreturn'? -- I figured it would be best just to report this, rather than create a patch myself.

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux