Re: BUG-lockdep and freeze (was: Arrr! Linux 2.6.18)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 30 Sep 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> It's not just unreadable and obviously buggy, it's so scarily that it's 
> hard to even talk about it. Lookie here:
> 
> 	#define HANDLE_STACK(cond) \
> 	        do while (cond) { \
> 	                unsigned long addr = *stack++; \
> 
> What the F*CK! "do while(cond) {" ???? 

Btw, it took me quite a while to realize how something like that can 
even compile. Seriously. Don't write code like that. Maybe some humans 
parse it as

	do {
		while (cond) {
			..
		}
	} while(0)

(which is the technically correct parsing and explains why it compiles 
and wors), but I suspect I'm not the only one who went "What the F*CK" 
when shown it without the "extraneous" braces.

For similar reasons, we write

	#define dummy(x) do { } while (0)

rather than the shorter

	#define dummy(x) do ; while (0)

(which some people _do_ seem to use. Aarggh!)

Or at least indent it. Or something.

I'll see if I can make git warn about "do <non-blockstatement> while ()", 
if only because I at least personally seem to have trouble parsing it.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux