On Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 02:31:16AM +0300, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 28, 2006 at 07:03:28PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> > hmmmm. What kernels did you test?
>
> mainline as of today + several unrelated Calgary patches I'll post
> shortly + your PCI domains patch + my Calgary patch. I'll test with
> iommu=off next.
>
> > That should narrow down the problems. A problem with aic94xx sorta
> > sounds like something unrelated.
>
> Not necessarily - Calgary is an isolating IOMMU, meaning that if we
> set up a mapping for aic94xx in the wrong IO space due to a Calgary
> bug, aic94xx will fall over and die. Usually however this happens a
> lot sooner. Also, we have code in Calgary to detect when an errant DMA
> happens and it hasn't triggered in this case.
Ok, turns out it's neither a PCI domains nor Calgary issue, since I
can reproduce it on mainline with iommu=off. Must be an aic94xx
issue, I'll send the details to linux-scsi in a bit.
Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
