Re: 2.6.18-mm2 - oops in cache_alloc_refill()

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:01:54 -0400
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:45:58 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> 
> (Adding a bunch of people to the cc: list now that I have a clue what is
> going on....)
> 
> > I'd expect it's the same bug - slab data structures have gone bad.
> 
> *bing*! We have a winner.  A quick check showed the kernel wasn't built with
> slab debugging enabled, so I turned on the more obvious options, and got
> rewarded with a traceback..

doh.  I'd assumed that CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB was enabled :(

> > Again: how come nobody else is hitting this?  Something's different.
> 
> gkrellm and wireless (specifically, gkrellm-wifi-0.9.12-3.fc6 from Fedora
> Core extras-development).  Kernel is still a 2.6.18 with *only* the
> origin.patch from -mm2 applied. Note that the gkrellm plugin hasn't had
> a change in the code since 01/03/2004 - hopefully there's been no unintentional
> API change on the kernel side since then...
> 
> Here's the traceback I got:
> 
> slab error in verify_redzone_free(): cache `size-32': memory outside object was overwritten
> [<c0103ad2>] dump_trace+0x64/0x1cd
> [<c0103c4d>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25
> [<c010415f>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> [<c01041fc>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
> [<c014c796>] __slab_error+0x17/0x1c
> [<c014cdac>] cache_free_debugcheck+0xaf/0x230
> [<c014d43e>] kfree+0x59/0x8c
> [<c02dc04a>] ioctl_standard_call+0x1da/0x218
> [<c02dc275>] wireless_process_ioctl+0x55/0x312
> [<c02d3750>] dev_ioctl+0x45f/0x49a
> [<c02c92aa>] sock_ioctl+0x1b3/0x1c6
> [<c0160322>] do_ioctl+0x22/0x67
> [<c01605a5>] vfs_ioctl+0x23e/0x251
> [<c01605ff>] sys_ioctl+0x47/0x64
> [<c0102cd3>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> DWARF2 unwinder stuck at syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> 
> Leftover inexact backtrace:
> 
> =======================
> de57e16c: redzone 1:0x170fc2a5, redzone 2:0x170fc200.
> 
> Repeated, over and over, just about once a second.
> 
> A quick strace of gkrellm finds these likely ioctl's causing the problem:
> 
> % grep ioctl /tmp/foo2 | sort -u | more
> ioctl(13, SIOCGIWESSID, 0xbfbcdb9c)     = 0
> ioctl(13, SIOCGIWRANGE, 0xbfbcdbdc)     = 0
> ioctl(13, SIOCGIWRATE, 0xbfbcdbbc)      = 0

Yes.  The main thing which those WE-21 patches do is to shorten the size of
various buffers which are used in wireless ioctls.

> Since I'm using an orinoco-based card, these 2 look like the most likely
> candidates.  WE-21 was merged between -mm1 and -mm2, which is why -mm1 was
> stable for me.

The WE-21 patches weren't in Jeff's tree for -mm1 or for -mm2.  They
appeared there transiently then quickly went mainline.  They _might_ have
been in the wireless git tree, although I often drop that due to git woes. 
But that hasn't happened recently....

> I'll let somebody else argue over what path these took that
> I never tripped over them in an earlier -mm before they hit Linus's tree...
> 
> commit baef186519c69b11cf7e48c26e75feb1e6173baa
> Author: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> Date:   Fri Sep 8 16:04:05 2006 -0400
> 
>     [PATCH] WE-21 support (core API)
> 
>     This is version 21 of the Wireless Extensions. Changelog :
>         o finishes migrating the ESSID API (remove the +1)
>         o netdev->get_wireless_stats is no more
>         o long/short retry
> 
>     This is a redacted version of a patch originally submitted by Jean
>     Tourrilhes.  I removed most of the additions, in order to minimize
>     future support requirements for nl80211 (or other WE successor).
> 
>     CC: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
>     Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> 
> commit eeec9f1a931262d69811135092c8447d6dccc3e6
> Author: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
> Date:   Tue Aug 29 18:02:31 2006 -0700
> 
>     [PATCH] WE-21 for orinoco
> 
>     Signed-off-by: Jean Tourrilhes <jt@hpl.hp.com>
>     Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> 

Try reverting those?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/