Re: 2.6.18-mm2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Friday 29 September 2006 22:14, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > BTW I was planning to make LOCAL_APIC unconditional on i386 too like 
> > > on x86-64.
> > 
> > please dont - embedded doesnt need it most of the time.
> 
> What do you mean with not need?  Local APIC is an infinitely better 
> interface than PIC and faster. On embedded too this makes a lot of 
> sense.

it's just not present or hardware-disabled.

> And a lot of modern systems don't even work anymore without APIC 
> enabled because Windows uses it and the BIOS haven't been tested 
> without it (e.g. you often find totally broken code paths in the AML 
> for PIC mode)
> 
> The code size also isn't a good argument because the delta
> isn't that big:
> 
>    text    data     bss     dec     hex filename
> 3303894  694980  436420 4435294  43ad5e obj32-up/vmlinux
> 3266532  665732  402372 4334636  42242c obj32-up-noapic/vmlinux
> 
> ~63K.

63K???? You've got to be kidding. That's huge. That's ~10% of the 
minconfig kernel. Even 1K would be bad. We did config hacks for half a K 
win. Please ... dont cripple the i686 kernel.

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux