Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction

On 9/28/06, Paul Jackson <[email protected]> wrote:

How might this play with Paul Menage's <[email protected]> patch posted
earlier today on lkml:

  [RFC][PATCH 0/4] Generic container system

I've not looked closely at Matt's patch, but I'm sure that there would
be no problems with hooking the container system to use task watchers
rather than patching fork.c/exit.c directly.

Paul
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
  • Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
    • From: Paul Jackson <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: How is Code in do_sys_settimeofday() safe in case of SMP and Nest Kernel Path?
• Next by Date: [PATCH] include children count, in Threads: field present in /proc/<pid>/status (take-1)
• Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH] Task watchers and modules (WAS Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction)
• Next by thread: 2.6.18-mm2 -- EIP: [<c11a962e>] klist_node_init+0x2b/0x3a SS:ESP 0068:f63a5f80
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]