Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark

Matt wrote:
> It is intended to be a tool for measuring the impact of task watchers
> on fork and exit-heavy workloads.

So ... you're keeping us in suspense ... what was the measured impact
of task watcher?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
  • [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
    • From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] Task watchers v2 Register cpuset task watcher
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] PCI: Turn pci_fixup_video into generic for embedded VGA
• Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
• Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]