Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark

Matt wrote:
> It is intended to be a tool for measuring the impact of task watchers
> on fork and exit-heavy workloads.

So ... you're keeping us in suspense ... what was the measured impact
of task watcher?

-- 
                  I won't rest till it's the best ...
                  Programmer, Linux Scalability
                  Paul Jackson <[email protected]> 1.925.600.0401
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
  - From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

References:
- [RFC][PATCH 00/10] Task watchers v2 Introduction
  - From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>
- [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
  - From: Matt Helsley <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH 05/10] Task watchers v2 Register cpuset task watcher
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2.6.18] PCI: Turn pci_fixup_video into generic for embedded VGA
Previous by thread: [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
Next by thread: Re: [Lse-tech] [RFC][PATCH 02/10] Task watchers v2 Benchmark
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]