Re: [PATCH RFC 1/4] Generic BUG handling.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andrew Morton wrote:
What is the locking for these lists?  I don't see much in here.  It has
implications for code which wants to do BUG while holding that lock..

There's no locking. This is a direct copy of the original powerpc code. I assume, but haven't checked, that there's a lock to serialize module loading/unloading, so the insertion/deletion is all properly synchronized. The only other user is traversal when actually handling a bug; if you're very unlucky this could happen while you're actually loading/unloading and you would see the list in an inconsistent state. I guess we could put a lock there, and trylock it on traversal; at least that would stop a concurrent modload/unload from getting in there while we're trying to walk the list.

Shouldn't this be u64? ;)

I'll get right on that. And perhaps it should be signed if people overshoot and introduce a negative number of BUGs.

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux