Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 13:46:19 -0700
Cc: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected]
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
Sender: [email protected]
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20060913)

Roland Dreier wrote:

NAK -- I don't want to generate worse code to fix a compiler warning
false positive.


Maybe we should have a "make defined" operation for this kind of thing:

   #define DEFVALUE(x)   asm("" : "=rm" (x))

Which is pretty ugly, I admit...

   J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
  - From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
  - From: Roland Dreier <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: GPLv3 Position Statement
Next by Date: Re: 2.6.18-1.2689.fc6PAE: oops in ext3_clear_inode+0x52/0x8b
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 24 of 28] IB/mthca - Fix compiler warnings with gcc4 on possible unitialized variables
Next by thread: [PATCH 25 of 28] IB/ipath - Set CPU affinity early
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux