Re: [PATCH] Put the BUG __FILE__ and __LINE__ info out of line

[Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>]

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 23:49:49 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > hm.  Bigger vmlinux, smaller .text.
> >   
> 
> Yep.
> 
> > It means that we'll hit handle_BUG with that extra EIP pushed on the stack.
> >  What does that do to the stack trace, and to the unwinder?
> >   
> Dunno.  I was hoping Andi would pop up with the appropriate CFI gunk, if 
> necessary.  But the reason for making it a call was to make it as 
> unwindable as possible.
> 
> > It'll also muck up the displayed EIP, not that that matters a lot (well, it
> > might matter a bit if the BUG is in an inlined function).
> >
> > We could get the correct EIP by fishing it off the stack (and subtracting
> > five from it?)
> >   
> 
> Yes, that's possible.
> 
> > Or we could assume that BUG doesn't return (it doesn't) and make that call
> > a jmp.  But then we'd really lose the EIP.
> 
> Right.  Or it could save the EIP along with the line and filename.
> 

Plan #17 is to just put the BUG inline and then put the EIP+file*+line into
a separate section, then search that section at BUG time to find the record
whose EIP points back at this ud2a.

It's a bit messy for modules, but it minimises the .text impact and keeps
disassembly happy, no?

And if done right it can probably be used by other architectures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/