Re: [NFS] [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: Allow max size of NFSd payload to be configured.

On Monday September 25, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> It looks to me like totalram is actually measured in pages.  So in
> practice this gives almost everyone 8k here.  So that 12 should be
> something like 12 - PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT?

Uhm.... yes.  Thanks.
But are the pages that totalram is measure in, normal pages, of
page_cache pages?  And is there a difference?
Should we use PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT, or PAGE_SHIFT?
And why do we have both if they are numerically identical?

I'll submit a patch which uses
        12 - PAGE_SHIFT
in a little while.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [NFS] [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: Allow max size of NFSd payload to be configured.
  - From: Hugh Dickins <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 000 of 11] knfsd: Introduction
  - From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: Allow max size of NFSd payload to be configured.
  - From: NeilBrown <[email protected]>
- Re: [NFS] [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: Allow max size of NFSd payload to be configured.
  - From: "J. Bruce Fields" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Illustration of warning explosion silliness
Next by Date: Re: [patch] remove MNT_NOEXEC check for PROT_EXEC MAP_PRIVATE mmaps
Previous by thread: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: Allow max size of NFSd payload to be configured.
Next by thread: Re: [NFS] [PATCH 009 of 11] knfsd: Allow max size of NFSd payload to be configured.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]