From: "Siddha, Suresh B" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 17:23:55 -0700
> I am flushing the pte entry in ptep_clear_flush() and it is Ok not
> to do another TLB flush after doing set_pte_at().
>
> On Sparc64, this new set_pte_at() (after ptep_clear_flush) will not batch
> any TLB flush as the previous pte contents were zero.
>
> We are Ok with this patch, isn't it?
Ok, it seems PowerPC also has the "don't do anything if previous PTE
was zero" logic. So yes, it should be ok.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
