Re: forcedeth - WOL [SOLVED]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 22:38:06 +0200
Martin Filip <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> Bj__rn Steinbrink p____e v St 27. 09. 2006 v 20:38 +0200:
> 
> > Did you check that WOL was enabled? I need to re-activate it after each
> > boot (I guess that's normal, not sure though).
> > The output of "ethtool eth0" should show:
> > 
> >         Supports Wake-on: g
> >         Wake-on: g
> > 
> Yes, of course :)
> 
> > Also, I remember a bugzilla entry in which it was said that the MAC was
> > somehow reversed by the driver. I that is still the case (I can't find
> > the bugzilla entry right now), you might just reverse the MAC address in
> > your WOL packet to workaround the bug.
> 
> Hey! this is really crazy :) but it works! To bo honest - I really do
> not know what crazy bug could cause problems like this. I thought it's
> NIC thing to manage all the work about WOL. I thought OS only sets NIC
> into "WOL mode".
> 
> But seeing this - one packet for windows and one magic packet for linux
> driver - I really do not get it.
> 

Are you saying that byte-reversing the MAC address make WOL work correctly?

What tool do you use to send the packet, and how is it being invoked?

Do we know if this reversal *always* happens with this driver, or only
sometimes?

Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux