On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 15:05 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 12:35:33 -0700
> john stultz <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > + while (offset > clock->cycle_interval << (shift + 1))
> > + shift++;
>
> hurts my brain.
Yea. Its not the most obvious patch, but the complexity is pretty
isolated.
> I have a vague feeling that this can be done with
> something like ffz(~(offset/clock->cycle_interval))+epsilon, but that hurts
> my brain too.
Agreed. I don't want to obfuscate this code much more. In my opinion,
the loop is tightly bounded and not expensive enough to try to optimize.
thanks
-john
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
