Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18

Arnd wrote:

An even better strategy is to do what the better architecture implementations in linux do and to apply common sense. "better" of course is rather subjective, but I typically recommend looking at arch/parisc as a good example.

Sure - we will go with that.

./linux-2.6.x/include/asm-parisc/system.h

/* interrupt control */

#define local_save_flags(x) __asm__ __volatile__("ssm 0, %0" : "=r" (x) : : "memory") #define local_irq_disable() __asm__ __volatile__("rsm %0,%%r0\n" : : "i" (PSW_I) : "memory" ) #define local_irq_enable() __asm__ __volatile__("ssm %0,%%r0\n" : : "i" (PSW_I) : "memory" )

:)

-Robin -

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Prev by Date: Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC] exponential update_wall_time
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/4] Blackfin: arch patch for 2.6.18
• Next by thread: [PATCH 3/4] Blackfin: documents and maintainer patch
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]