[email protected] (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> The following patch set should be enough to clear up the
> outstanding issues with genirq on i386 and x86_64. This actually
> takes things a step farther and moves all of architecture
> dependencies I could find into the appropriate architecture.
>
> So hopefully we are finally close enough that other architectures
> will be able implement msi support, without too much trouble.
>
> msi: Simplify msi sanity checks by adding with generic irq code.
> msi: Only use a single irq_chip for msi interrupts
> msi: Refactor and move the msi irq_chip into the arch code.
> msi: Move the ia64 code into arch/ia64
> htirq: Tidy up the htirq code
>
> Eric
Grr.. My ia64 compiler is way too slow. It just told me I had some
trivial bugs in the altix portion of what I posted. Sorry I forgot
to mention all I can do is compile test ia64.
So here comes a second time with code that actually compiles :)
Darn this code that is so ugly that you have to test the cleanup on
multiple architectures!
Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
