Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction

On 26 Sep 2006 11:06:24 +0200
Andrew Victor <[email protected]> wrote:

> Patch 2 & 3 look correct, but they would need to be tested.

Ok, I've tested part 2 (at91_serial: Fix roundoff error in
at91_console_get_options), and it works on my AT91RM9200-EK board. In
fact, the latest git code does _not_ work -- I see the same garbage as
on ATSTK1000, and this patch fixes it.

Part 3 probably has real problems, and I'm not sure how to fix it. I'll
try some kind of "break timeout" so that any problems will at least be
transient. The current break code works on neither STK1000 nor
AT91RM9200-EK, so even a not-quite-100%-correct fix should be
acceptable, no?

I'm queuing up some patches now that I'll send off as soon as I get them
tested on both ARM and AVR32. This includes the big rename patch I've
been talking about.

Håvard
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction
    • From: Haavard Skinnemoen <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction
    • From: Russell King <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction
    • From: Andrew Victor <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [Fastboot] Stupid kexec/kdump question...
• Next by Date: Bad PTE VM: killing process hald-addon-keyb
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/3] at91_serial: Introduction
• Next by thread: [PATCH] debug_locks.h: add "struct task_struct;"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]