* Bill Huey <[email protected]> wrote: > Because the conversion of memory allocation routines like kmalloc and > kfree aren't safely callable within a preempt_disable critical section > since they were incompletely converted in the -rt. [...] they were not 'incompletely converted' - they are /intentionally/ fully preemptible. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- References:
- 2.6.18-rt1
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
- Re: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- From: Bill Huey (hui) <[email protected]>
- 2.6.18-rt1
- Prev by Date: Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))
- Next by Date: Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] move put_task_struct() reaping into a thread [Re: 2.6.18-rt1]
- Index(es):
 |