Am Dienstag, 26. September 2006 23:43 schrieb Linus Torvalds: > On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > > out of curiosity, wouldn't be better to sync with Andrew via git? > > Why via plain patches? > > > > What am I missing? > > I think you're just missing that we've become so used to it that it's just > easier than all the alternatives. [...] > I think it's worked out pretty well, no? Nearly everyone else seems to remove the '[PATCH]' from the subject line when putting things into git. Everything I suspect coming from Andrew to your tree still has it. Is this intentional or just yet another skript needing a fix? :) Eike
Attachment:
pgpIsQZqyLpzu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- References:
- x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
- From: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>
- Re: x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
- From: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[email protected]>
- Re: x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] x86: Allow users to force a panic on NMI
- Next by Date: Re: When will the lunacy end? (Was Re: [PATCH] uswsusp: add pmops->{prepare,enter,finish} support (aka "platform mode"))
- Previous by thread: Re: x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
- Next by thread: Re: x86/x86-64 merge for 2.6.19
- Index(es):
 |