Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 10:39:30AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> - Should it have been done at the block layer rather than at the scsi layer?
>
> This was already mentioned when he sent it to linux-scsi a few days ago.
> There are scsi commands which bypass the block layer, such as SG_IO, and
I do not think any command completely bypasses the block layer now.
SG_IO, tape, sd and scanning insertion go through blk_execute_rq_nowait
for insertion. For completion they go through blk_complete_request +
end_that_request_first/last in the normal path and blk_complete_request
+ blk_requeue_request in the retry path.
> block layer stats can make an extremely busy disc look not busy.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
