Hi, * Frank Ch. Eigler ([email protected]) wrote: > Hi - > > > [...] > > - It _does not_ change the compiler optimisations. > > Like any similar mechanism, it does force the compiler to change its > code generation, so one can't claim this too strongly. > Yes, memory dependencies are changed, you are right. I was principally talking about the inline and unrolled loops optimisations. > > [...] Comments are welcome, > > I'm still uneasy about the use of varargs. The current code now uses > the formatting string as metadata to be matched (strcmp) between > producer and consumer. A general tool that would use them would have > to start parsing general printf directives. If you want to generate probes automatically, yes. > I believe they are not > quite general enough either e.g. to describe a raw binary blob. > If you want to dump a raw binary blob, what about : MARK(mysubsys_myevent, "char %p %u", blobptr, blobsize); where %p is a pointer to an array of char and %u the length ? My idea is to use the string to identify what is referred by a pointer, so it can be casted into this type with some kind of coherency between the marker and the probe. > I realize they serve a useful purpose in abbreviating what otherwise > one might have to do (like that multiplicity of STAP_MARK_* type/arity > permutations). But maybe there is a better way. > I think that duplicating the number of marker macros could easily make them unflexible and ugly. This is why I am trying to come with this generic macro. > Also, while regparm(0) may provide some comfort on x86, is there good > reason to believe that the same trick works (and will continue to > work) on non-x86 platforms to invoke a non-varargs callee with a > varargs caller? > Good point, I will setup a va_args in the probe. When correctly used, however, there is no need to use the format string : we can directly get the variables from the var arg list if we know in advance what the string will be. Mathieu OpenPGP public key: http://krystal.dyndns.org:8080/key/compudj.gpg Key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: [email protected] (Frank Ch. Eigler)
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- References:
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: Mathieu Desnoyers <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 5/7] Use %gs for per-cpu sections in kernel
- Next by Date: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.13 for 2.6.17
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Linux Kernel Markers 0.11 for 2.6.17
- Index(es):