On Monday 25 September 2006 22:59, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Andi Kleen wrote:
> > If this is really 1/1 why does it patch a file called pda.h?
> >
> > I've thrown away the local pda patches before this because I assumed
> > you started fresh.
> >
> > Somehow I'm not surprised that nothing applies. You seem to always
> > start with some random tree that nobody else has.
> >
> Well, it's based on -mm, but I guess that includes pieces of your patch
> series. I was a bit surprised to see pda.h still in -mm with the rest
> dropped.
I see. Andrew reverted some stuff to fix his PII (which I broke BTW
it wasn't a problem in your original patches) but he didn't revert everything
only starting from the bisected patch.
Ok on the next resync everything will be dropped there.
> > Anyways, this patchkit has caused so much trouble and churn that I'll drop
> > it for now until after the .19 merge is done.
> >
> I'll respin it against your patches later today.
Thanks. It's not that urgent because the merge will need a few days
at least.
Also I must admit I haven't figured out yet if yours or Rusty's patchkit
is better. So far I was leaning towards yours, but that might be because
I haven't looked closely at Rusty's version.
-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
