>> I assume that you have confirmed that the machine doesn't have hardware >> problems? Does it run some earlier kernel OK? > The disks are both fine, they worked in other pcs without problems. The > ide controller card also worked fine, and the motherboard is new - > whatever you can expect with that. Maybe the combination is the problem. So this is definitely a hardware problem? Which component is most likely to be the bad one? -- Regards/MfG, Christian Weiske
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- References:
- 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- From: Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de>
- Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- From: Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de>
- Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
- Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- From: Christian Weiske <cweiske@cweiske.de>
- 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 1/8] UML - Const more data
- Next by Date: [PATCH 3/8] UML - Fix missing x86_64 register definitions
- Previous by thread: Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- Next by thread: Re: 2.6.18 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000,0000a
- Index(es):