On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 04:17 +0200, Voluspa wrote:
> Here's another data point: I tried 2.6.18-rt3 today on a x86_64
> notebook. I'm on an eternal quest for extended battery time, so
> NO_HZ would be perfect. Long story shortened, HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> (prerequisite for NO_HZ) caused the CPU to never step down from max
> speed (ondemand, powernow_k8) at 2200 MHz.
>
> In addition, something invisible used very frequent bursts of ~30% SYS
> CPU. Turning from PREEMPT_RT to PREEMPT_DESKTOP introduced occasional
> bursts of ~50% USER CPU (mixed with the SYS). Toggling RCU model
> made no difference.
>
It seems like you don't need all of 2.6.18-rt3 , you just want dynamic
tick .. You can obtain just the HRT/dynamic tick patch from here,
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.18/
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
